E California
Police Depts Sheriffs Depts
Loading Map ...
Sheriff's Department Amador County
47% SCORE
Average for 4 Sections: 47%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing counties with under 50k population. Counties with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
| Police Funding: 33% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Police Budget Cost per Person | ||||
| Misconduct Settlements | ||||
| Fines/Forfeitures | ||||
| Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population) | ||||
| Police Violence: 63% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Force Used per Arrest | ||||
| Deadly Force per Arrest | ||||
| Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest | ||||
| Racial Disparities in Deadly Force | ||||
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
| Police Accountability: 36% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misconduct Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Excessive Force Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Discrimination Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Approach to Law Enforcement: 58% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses | ||||
| Homicides Solved | ||||
| Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests | ||||
| Jail Incarceration Rate | ||||
| Jail Deaths per 1,000 | ||||
N/A Killings by Police
This agency did not reportedly kill anyone from 2013-21.
49 civilian complaints of police misconduct
29% were ruled in favor of civilians from 2016-21.
4,041 arrests made
74% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-21.
Section Score: 33% ▶+12%
Police Funding By Year
$10.2M | 23,399 Residents | $436 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 89% of Depts
Source: US Census Bureau
Number of officers per 1k population
49 Officers | 20.9 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 66% of Depts
Source: Federal LEOKA Database
Section Score: 63% ▶-3%
Deadly Force
N/A Killings by Police from 2013-21 | N/A every 10k arrests
No Data Found Add Data
Source: Mapping Police Violence
Police Violence by Race
Black Latinx N.Am API Other White
Population of Amador County
13%
79%
Amador County Sheriff's Dept Demographics
People Arrested
10%
75%
People Killed
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Mapping Police Violence, LEMAS
Section Score: 36% ▶+17%
Source: CA Department of Justice
Total civilian complaints
49 from 2016-21 | 29% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Complaints Not Sustained Complaints Sustained
Complaints of Misconduct in Jail
22 Reported | 9% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Complaints Reported Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Complaints of Police Discrimination
0 Complaints Reported
Alleged Crimes Committed by Police
9 Reported | 0% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Complaints Reported Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Section Score: 58% ▶+17%
Source: Uniform Crime Report
Arrests By Year
4,041 Arrests Reported from 2013-2021
Low Level Arrests Other Arrests
More Info
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
3,009 Arrests | 18 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 58% of Depts
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 74% )
Drug Possession ( 16% )
Violent Crime ( 10% )
Homicides Unsolved
8 Homicides from 2013-21 | 3 Unsolved
^ Solved Fewer Homicides than 42% of Depts
Jail Incarceration rate
79 Avg Daily Jail Population | 4 per 1k residents
^ More than 35% of Sheriff's Depts
People in Jail Without Being Convicted
34 % of People in Jail
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
0-29% 30-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90-100% Incomplete
| Sheriff's Department | Score | 5YR |
|---|---|---|
| 55. Los Angeles County 27% | ▶+3% | |
| 54. Alameda County 27% | ||
| 53. Kern County 27% | ▶+10% | |
| 52. San Diego County 28% | ▶-15% | |
| 51. Fresno County 29% | ▶+5% | |
| 50. Marin County 30% | ▶+8% | |
| 49. Trinity County 31% | ▶+13% | |
| 48. Sonoma County 31% | ▶+4% | |
| 47. Placer County 31% | ▶+14% | |
| 46. Colusa County 32% | ▶+9% | |
| 45. Solano County 32% | ▶+10% | |
| 44. San Joaquin County 32% | ▶-10% | |
| 43. Stanislaus County 33% | ▶-16% | |
| 42. Sutter County 34% | ▶+11% | |
| 41. Humboldt County 34% | ▶+4% | |
| 40. Santa Clara County 34% | ▶+8% | |
| 39. Imperial County 35% | ▶+2% | |
| 38. Sacramento County 35% | ||
| 37. Madera County 35% | ▶-6% | |
| 36. Napa County 36% | ▶-5% | |
| 35. Mendocino County 36% | ▶+19% | |
| 34. San Mateo County 37% | ▶+6% | |
| 33. Monterey County 37% | ▶-6% | |
| 32. Butte County 37% | ▶+6% | |
| 31. Orange Cnty Sheriffs Department 37% | ▶-18% | |
| 30. Yolo County 38% | ▶+5% | |
| 29. Merced County 38% | ▶+9% | |
| 28. Glenn County 40% | ▶-1% | |
| 27. Yuba County 40% | ▶+5% | |
| Sheriff's Department | Score | 5YR |
|---|---|---|
| 26. Kings County 41% | ▶+5% | |
| 25. San Bernardino County 41% | ▶-3% | |
| 24. Santa Barbara County 41% | ▶-12% | |
| 23. Mono County 42% | ▶+5% | |
| 22. Plumas County 42% | ▶+5% | |
| 21. Contra Costa County 42% | ▶-14% | |
| 20. Nevada County 42% | ▶+4% | |
| 19. Del Norte County 42% | ▶+1% | |
| 18. Calaveras County 44% | ▶-13% | |
| 17. San Luis Obispo County 44% | ▶-11% | |
| 16. Tulare County 44% | ▶-5% | |
| 15. Mariposa County 45% | ▶+6% | |
| 14. San Benito County 47% | ▶-7% | |
| 13. Amador County 47% | ▶+11% | |
| 12. Lassen County 47% | ▶+5% | |
| 11. Lake County 47% | ▶-19% | |
| 10. Shasta County 48% | ▶+3% | |
| 9. Santa Cruz County 48% | ▶-4% | |
| 8. El Dorado County 48% | ▶-3% | |
| 7. Inyo County 49% | ▶+1% | |
| 6. Riverside County 49% | ▶-3% | |
| 5. Modoc County 49% | ▶-3% | |
| 4. Tuolumne County 51% | ▶+2% | |
| 3. Tehama County 51% | ▶+5% | |
| 2. Siskiyou County 52% | ▶-19% | |
| 1. Ventura County 52% | ▶-9% | |
| * Alpine County 39% | ▶+2% | |
| * San Francisco 40% | ▶+14% | |
| * Sierra County 41% | ▶-3% | |
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.
methodology Source Data
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
- Contact Your County Sheriff, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
Advocacy Tip: This state has a Police Bill of Rights law. These laws make it harder to hold police accountable. Call state legislators and tell them to repeal this law.
- Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.
